HEALTHCARE DELIVERY ORGANIZATION PRESENTATION

I need help with a Accounting question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

 

The organization I chose to write about is a for – profit hospital. Any and all information collected should be in regards to the same organization. Please follow the guidelines below and include all of the proper information. I also attached the grading rubric. Please feel free to reach out with any questions or concerns. Thanks!

OPTION #1: HEALTHCARE DELIVERY ORGANIZATION PRESENTATION

Develop a financial analysis of a healthcare delivery organization of your choosing. The intent of this assignment is to evaluate the financial and operational health of the organization and disseminate the information to the class. You may pursue, analyze, and synthesize any information source you choose (e.g., website content, personal interviews, organizational documentation). Strive to be rigorous and thorough in your research.

Note: For-profit organizations are generally easier to research than not-for-profits as all financials are reportable to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Final Paper Instructions:

  • Projects are not limited in size, should be professional in appearance, and cover (at a minimum) the evaluation of the metrics discussed in Gapenski and Pink (2015), which are detailed in Chapter 13 in the sections about Ratio Analysis, DuPont Analysis, and Operating Indicator Analysis.
  • You may pursue, analyze, and synthesize any information source you choose (e.g., website content, personal interviews, organizational documentation). Strive to be rigorous and thorough in your research.
  • Your final presentation should report on the business’ location(s), competitive market(s), service lines, and business segments, for example. Unless otherwise indicated, a five-year trend analysis—including the most recent year of available information/data—is expected.
  • Do not just report the data—discuss what it means. Ultimately, would you invest in the company? Why or why not?
  • Presentations should adhere to Advisory Board formatting. See the Strategic Plan Template for an example.

HCM301 Module 8 Portfolio Project

HCM301 Module 8 Portfolio Project
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
40.0 to >32.0 ptsMeets Expectation

The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

32.0 to >24.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

24.0 to >16.0 ptsBelow Expectation

The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

16.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
40.0 to >32.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of accounting and finance in healthcare management; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

32.0 to >24.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge in accounting and finance in healthcare management.

24.0 to >16.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge in accounting and finance in healthcare management.

16.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
40.0 to >32.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of accounting and finance in healthcare management.

32.0 to >24.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis of accounting and finance in healthcare management.

24.0 to >16.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical analysis of accounting and finance in healthcare management.

16.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate critical analysis.

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation
40.0 to >32.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in accounting and finance in healthcare management.

32.0 to >24.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation of accounting and finance in healthcare management.

24.0 to >16.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation of accounting and finance in healthcare management.

16.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation
40.0 to >32.0 ptsMeets Expectation

The presentation was highly effective and appropriately addressed the target audience.

32.0 to >24.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in selection, application or audience of the presentation.

24.0 to >16.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Major errors or omissions in selection, application or audience of the presentation.

16.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

The presentation was totally ineffective and not targeted at the specified audience.

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Cite and report on the business location(s), the competitive market(s), service lines, business segments, etc. Unless otherwise indicated, a five year trend analysis – including the most recent year of available information/data.

16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Cite and report on most of the following: the business location(s), the competitive market(s), service lines, business segments, etc. Unless otherwise indicated, a five year trend analysis – including the most recent year of available information/data.

12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Cite and report on at least three of the following: the business location(s), the competitive market(s), service lines, business segments, etc. Unless otherwise indicated, a five year trend analysis – including the most recent year of available information/data.

8.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Does not cite and report on the business location(s), the competitive market(s), service lines, business segments, etc. Unless otherwise indicated, a five year trend analysis – including the most recent year of available information/data.

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Source Material
20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

8.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper Advisory Board formatting including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.

16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper Advisory Board formatting. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.

12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper Advisory Board formatting. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.

8.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper Advisory Board formatting. Does not conform to project requirements.

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style
20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

8.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

8.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

20.0 pts
Total Points: 300.0